Got a question? Call us at +1-800-771-9415

Posts Tagged ‘Searcher’

An Outside Perspective Helps

Monday, May 20th, 2013

 

The curse of knowledge, as made famous by Dan & Chip Heath’s book, Made to Stick, says that once you learn something, it’s hard to remember what it was like NOT to know it. Without realizing it, you tend to assume that “everyone knows that.”


This is important for PPC copywriting because in-house copywriters — i.e., copywriters working for the company they are writing ads for — get a hefty dose of The Curse of Knowledge. They know stuff about the company through simple immersion that most people don’t know. Yet because they’ve known it for so long and because all their co-workers know the same stuff, it becomes really easy to accidentally project that knowledge onto the searcher.


This contest is a perfect example of The Curse of Knowledge at work:




When you work for a company that specializes in creating customized and personalized products, you start to assume that EVERYONE knows that — to the point where it’s not even emphasizing in the copy. Heck the 20% off sale is news. Free shipping is an important draw. The customized thing, well, that’s just par for the course.


But to the searcher, the fact that you’re advertising a customized phone case ISN’T obvious or secondary — it’s the lead (or lede) for the story and putting that fact in the body copy is essentially “burying the lede”! It’s the 20% off bit that’s secondary.


And that’s why the winning ad grabbed 192% higher Click-Through Rates than the losing ad.


So how can you avoid The Curse of Knowledge? Easy — just hire some outside copywriters once in a while. Get an outside perspective from people who don’t know what you know about your own company. That’s how the company in the example contest did it. And that’s a tip from the Boosters you can take to the bank.


 



The Right Word and the Almost Right Word

Monday, May 13th, 2013

 

Today’s column will give you two tips for the price of one. But first, check out the contest that demonstrates both tips:




OK, first tip: beware of the emotional association of your words. Yes, cheap does mean “inexpensive.” But it also means “of poor quality, inferior” and “worthy of no respect” and “vulgar.” NOT the kinds of qualities that a bride would look for in a wedding dress, even if she would like to get her dress at a discount.


So you can see why headlining your ad with “Cheap Wedding Dresses” would be problematic, whereas 70% Off Wedding Dresses” would be quite attractive in comparison.


The other tip? When advertising discounts, it helps to reassure the buyer of quality. Even when you don’t describe the products as “cheap,” anytime you advertise a discounted price, concerns about quality inevitably arise in the mind of the prospect. So a phrase like “You Will Look Beautiful” really helps.


“See our dresses” now also helps because it offers the searcher the chance to judge the dresses with her own eyes. If it was me, I might even ditch the “& Save Money Too!” to include the “30-day Returns” or some such to further alleviate quality concerns.


And that’s it — 2 Tips From the Boosters to help your PPC ad copy effectiveness.


 



The Power of Consistency? It’s Worth Testing!

Thursday, April 25th, 2013

 

Ok, first, look at these two ads from a “Designer Wallpaper” campaign, and pick the ad you believe performed best:



This one is kind of tough. Ad B has a better keyword match-up in the headline and it places the savings offer up-front at the very beginning of the first line of copy. And yet, Ad B lost. It was Ad A that more than doubled Click-Through Rates, boosting them by 143%


So what does Ad A have going for it?


While there are a few nuances of language in the headline and first line of body copy — “on sale” vs. “sale,” plus the claim of “Exclusive” — I think the real driver is the fact that Ad A doesn’t make the online store’s membership requirement explicit in the way that Ad B does.


Ad B says “Join Now,” which sets off alarm bells if you’re just shopping and don’t want to join a membership site. Ad A doesn’t. And I think that ups the Click-Through Rate.


But then, when people DO click through, wouldn’t they bounce once they see the registration requirement? Not in this case. Once the searcher commits to seeing what the e-tailer has on offer, she gladly delivers up an e-mail address to browse the website — she’s already made that commitment.


But when that same searcher is actively sorting through offers and ads, she has no commitment, and the idea of a membership gets rejected.


Will it always work this way? Don’t count on it. But is it worth testing? Absolutely! And that’s why this contest is a win of the week.


 



The Power of Confidence

Monday, April 22nd, 2013

 

Look, if YOU don’t think your products are great/cool/unique/high value — than why should anyone else? Why choose you over the other guy if even you’re not confident in your own product?


This is a big element in sales and it’s just as big an element when it comes to PPC Ad Copy, which is one reason unsubstantiated claims actually work to boost CTR — they communicate that all important confidence. Here’s a perfect example




Notice how the winning ad proudly proclaims the client’s horse products to be both “awesome” and “affordable,” while the losing ad mentions nothing about the quality of the products, the size of the selection, or even the pricing.


Is it any wonder that the winning ad boosted Click-Through Rates by 52%?


Granted those claims are unsubstantiated, but they at least communicate the confidence of the seller and make the online store worth checking out in order to substantiate those claims. Without that, what’s the point of clicking on the ad?


So take a tip from the boosters: communicate confidence with your ads. If your stuff is awesome, go ahead and say so. Just make sure to substantiate that claim post-click, once the searcher gets to your landing page


 



What They Want vs. What You THINK They Want

Friday, April 19th, 2013

 

Before we do anything else, pick the winner:




So without preamble, Ad A won the contest, more than doubling Click-Through Rates. And in looking at this win, I couldn’t help but see the results as part of a larger pattern, wherein ads containing copy about:

  1. Compatibility Matching, and
  2. “Affluent” Singles/Men

almost always lose to ads that offer the chance for the searcher to “find” matches on their own and that leave out any mention of affluence.

So if they don’t respond to these factors — or if searchers actually do care about them, but are offended at such a bald mention of them in PPC copy — then what DO they seem to respond to?


Answer: potential dates who are “mature” (even when the add isn’t specifically aimed at over-40 singles) and “ready to find someone” (which in this ad takes the form of “looking for dates”).


Now, this may not seem like that big a deal, because it’s “just” online dating, but the dynamic IS a big deal when you think about it in terms of using PPC to find out what your prospects ACTUALLY care about rather than what you THINK they care about.


And once you have that insight it’s applicable to far more than just PPC — it can then be used to improve landing pages, Web copy in general, and even e-mails.


But you’ll never get those insights unless you test, and unless your PPC ad writers come at the ads from different angles, testing out different appeals. In other words, unless you have multiple ad writers capable of adopting an outside perspective on your business and industry.


So what kind of testing are YOU doing? And what are you learning from those tests?